>The White House publicly called for the suppression of 1A protected speech No, they didn't. This is false. >That the company can draw from other potential m

>The White House publicly called for the suppression of 1A protected speech No, they didn't. This is false. >That the company can draw from other potential motivations to justify that action is irrelevant to 1A. That you don't personally believe the actual reason they did this to be relevant is itself irrelevant.