5 ms·
Try to use a Nokia N900 today, and check if that's really the bar (I have one in my drawer). I think the bar is higher, and the experience is already better th
by MayeulC 5y ago
Try to use a Nokia N900 today, and check if that's really the bar (I have one in my drawer).
I think the bar is higher, and the experience is already better than that on a few mobile devices.
If talking about the UI, Plasma mobile is a bit experimental, but gets stuff done with bells and whistles, phosh is a bit barebones but better performant. If you want the Maemo UI, try Nemo mobile. When installing postmarketos on a device, you get quite a few to pick from.
If you talk about performance, there are plenty of devices to pick with better performance than the Pinephone (including the Pinephone Pro soon, and the Librem 5). It was meant as a cheap dev platform, and it has largely succeeded at that.
Now, telephony support is where it hurts. Supporting modems can get quite complex, so progress is slow. The Pinephone was deliberately engineered as to be doable.
Part of the Linux appeal is choice. Choose what you don't need, but we'll likely end up with different needs.
One way to bridge the gap is to get Android apps running. We're getting there thanks to waydroid.
- pjmlp 5y agoIt is definitely the bar, because many of the Linux based phone attempts aren't even able to match it.
- seba_dos1 5y agoI think the only use cases where my Librem 5 doesn't yet reach my Nokia N900 (not counting obvious form factor and spec differences) are related to the cameras.
- pjmlp 5y agoAnd the development experience versus Nokia's SDK.
- seba_dos1 5y agoI'd say the development experience on the Librem 5 is much better than fiddling with Scratchbox, at least for me. I have even developed things in an IDE (in fact, it was Qt Creator ;)) running right on the phone, with external screen and keyboard attached; and cross-compiling is pretty easy too. Scratchbox was a massive PITA if you needed something outside of the default toolchain.