It sounds like they don’t have a good understanding of the First Amendment. * The first amendment does not consider “hate speech” to be fighting words. * The

It sounds like they don’t have a good understanding of the First Amendment. * The first amendment does not consider “hate speech” to be fighting words. * The first amendment does protect falsehoods. The case mentioned from the 1970s was recently overruled. The exceptions to the first amendment they mentioned are narrower than they are portraying them as. It’s fine to use the first amendment as “inspiration” or a starting point. But please create your own list of exceptions. Those exceptions are the point where you can be imprisoned, not kicked off a platform.