12 ms·
Exactly this. These people are more than welcome to setup a blog and write up their views should they wish but there is an astronomical difference between them
by satysin 5y ago
Exactly this.
These people are more than welcome to setup a blog and write up their views should they wish but there is an astronomical difference between them posting their views on whatever subject they wish and inviting them onto a podcast listened to by tens of millions as if they are some sort of respected expert in the subject.
Also as I said in my original post this is not just aimed at Rogan's podcast but the media in general. Many times I have seen experts in a subject with decades of experience sat next to a random person from MumsNet or some other online community with anecdotes and nothing more. Yet they are sat side by side, given similar air time to communicate their views as if they are in some way 'equals' on the subject which is misrepresentation.
In no way am I saying the non-expert random person should be silenced but they also should not be given such a wide reaching platform due to laziness of the "news" service to find an actual expert to argue the other side.
- gitfan86 5y agoThey deserve free speech, but only if 50k people read it, not if 100M watch a video about it? How do you tell the 99M that they don't deserve to watch this media?
- paulryanrogers 5y agoSpotify doesn't have to bankroll grifters. If 99M people want something bad enough they'll find a way to get it. In fact before the Spotify exclusive Rogan could be found and listened to via any podcatcher or index.
- satysin 5y agoNothing to stop 100 million people going to their site.