7 ms·
Strange, the transcripts of the interviews are now delivered as google docs. I always thought it was just search-engine-fodder. Do some people really prefer to
by no_gravity 15y ago
Strange, the transcripts of the interviews are now delivered as google docs. I always thought it was just search-engine-fodder. Do some people really prefer to read the interviews?
- gregpilling 15y agoYes, I like to read the transcript. Mostly because it is faster to get through it, but also when I read the transcript I can Google names or thoughts in it. I also listen to the audio when I am on a walk or in the car.
- atldev 15y agoYes- audio is great for commute. But I can read the transcript in a fraction of the time. I do both depending on schedule, and like the option.
- hollerith 15y agoMost definitely some do.
- eric-hu 15y agoThere's a popular series of Ruby on Rails tutorial videos called Railscasts. Someone decided to textualize all of them--Asciicasts--because text has the benefit of being easily searchable. For me, I went straight for the doc so I could a quick scan. I just didn't have the time this morning to read or listen to all of it. If I could do a sped-up listen through, I might consider it. I would say in general having both an audio and text format is more powerful than just having one or the other.
- ableal 15y agoAnother point for transcripts is that most non-native English speakers will have a much easier time understanding written material.
- count 15y agoI read significantly faster than you can talk, and I don't have tons of free time. Why would you NOT prefer to read an interview, as long as its transcribed properly?
- sarenji 15y agoSome people are hearing-impaired and need a transcript in the absence of captions.
- mswen 15y agoI always read the transcript if it is available for interviews. It has to be at least 3 times as fast as listening.