Fair points, but holistically one could argue he causes more misinformation and controversy than he contributes to scientific progress and education. Regarding

Fair points, but holistically one could argue he causes more misinformation and controversy than he contributes to scientific progress and education. Regarding censorship, where does one draw the line? Misinformation? A conversation encouraging self-harm? The harm of others? Without holding media to some reasonable standard an anything goes mentality develops.