3 ms·

at any rate I think within a month or two we'll see the court case when Rogan inevitably sues them i'll be rooting for spotify your point is valid, but I woul

at any rate I think within a month or two we'll see the court case when Rogan inevitably sues them i'll be rooting for spotify your point is valid, but I would argue that by leaving content up on a website you're sort of publishing it at will suppose you posted a picture I took of the grand canyon on your website you paid me for that picture, so you have exclusive rights you take it down?? ehhh maybe if you prevent me from publishing it elsewhere now? this will be in court for sure

libertine 5y ago
I just think that Spotify has an added responsibility on how they should manage their content. >you paid me for that picture, so you have exclusive rights >you take it down?? ehhh maybe if you prevent me from publishing it elsewhere now? Well that's an extremely simple take on the subject... again there's a context. A better take would be to not publish your picture because of someone claiming that you were acting/acted in a "improper manner" (not in the legal sense). You have a name, JRE is a brand as well, not to mention the guests he has, so removing the content that was once published in a sense it's also sending a message to the public. I have no clue why they removed ep. "#91 - Bill Burr". I like Bill Burr, he is a funny comedian. I look for his content to be entertained, not to be informed. Is he paddling misinformation? Is he homophobic? A racist? Or he said something someone didn't like? Who knows. We just know that one of his appearances is no longer listed. At this point the best would be to let the man go with the money.
- tatersolid 5y ago
  > A racist? I don’t follow tabloid stuff, so this may have changed, but at least during the filming of his recent Netflix specials: Bill Burr is married, and his wife is African-American.
- codeivore 5y ago
  yeah, some of the removals are perplexing haha

libertine 5y ago

I just think that Spotify has an added responsibility on how they should manage their content. >you paid me for that picture, so you have exclusive rights >you take it down?? ehhh maybe if you prevent me from publishing it elsewhere now? Well that's an extremely simple take on the subject... again there's a context. A better take would be to not publish your picture because of someone claiming that you were acting/acted in a "improper manner" (not in the legal sense). You have a name, JRE is a brand as well, not to mention the guests he has, so removing the content that was once published in a sense it's also sending a message to the public. I have no clue why they removed ep. "#91 - Bill Burr". I like Bill Burr, he is a funny comedian. I look for his content to be entertained, not to be informed. Is he paddling misinformation? Is he homophobic? A racist? Or he said something someone didn't like? Who knows. We just know that one of his appearances is no longer listed. At this point the best would be to let the man go with the money.

tatersolid 5y ago
> A racist? I don’t follow tabloid stuff, so this may have changed, but at least during the filming of his recent Netflix specials: Bill Burr is married, and his wife is African-American.
codeivore 5y ago
yeah, some of the removals are perplexing haha