I'm not sure how Brian Armstrong chose those particular five articles to link to at the end of this post, but I don't think that Coinbase meant to say that thos

I'm not sure how Brian Armstrong chose those particular five articles to link to at the end of this post, but I don't think that Coinbase meant to say that those articles reflect its own preferred position on speech or intermediary liability, as all five take somewhat different positions, which may even conflict with each other. So I don't think this is a subtle way of revealing Coinbase's new position on §230 reform or something. I suspect it's a bit more like "hey, in case you haven't noticed, intermediaries' role is a pretty hot debate lately, as indicated by this range of views about it". (Thanks for the tofu!)