> That's not censorship, it's business No, it most certainly is censorship. It is also business. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. I'd also note that

> That's not censorship, it's business No, it most certainly is censorship. It is also business. Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. I'd also note that it is completely legal, but that I (personally) think that such practices are harmful. > shout at the manager of a shoe store for not selling books? A shoe store? That's not a good analogy. I wouldn't complain that Spotify doesn't offer downloads of popular software, would I? Would people complain if Barnes & Noble suddenly pulled a number of "controversial" books from their shelves after public outcry?