5 ms·
He creates his own job, so he creates one job. His statement is a fallacy, if you use his little trick(his small business = 0 jobs) and multiply by the number
by forgottenpaswrd 15y ago
He creates his own job, so he creates one job.
His statement is a fallacy, if you use his little trick(his small business = 0 jobs) and multiply by the number of small business you have a false statement: "small business creates no jobs".
We know by simple statistics that small business in fact create most of the jobs, even if they only employ themselves and their family first.
- silverbax88 15y agoThat job has already been created. A tax cut will for him will not magically mean he will decide he has enough extra cash to create a meaningless job.
- jsmcgd 15y agoThough it will mean that other people are more likely to start their own one or more man operation.
- zumda 15y agoReally? I highly doubt that. Most people don't want their own business, they want a steady income and not think about their jobs after 8 hours. A small decrease in tax won't change that.
- jsmcgd 15y agoMost people might want that but this legislation isn't aimed at most people. It's for the segment of society that do want their own business.
- perfunctory 15y agoAnd those already have their own businesses. And if not, quitting your day job and starting a business... -1 + 1 = 0
- jsmcgd 15y agoThere are many more people who are employed and thinking about starting their own business than have actually started their own business. Creating your own business: +1 job. Freeing up a position at your previous employment: +1 job. 1 + 1 = 2 :P
- silverbax88 15y agoWhy would it mean that? People are going to quit a job and income for no income because of...potential tax breaks?
- jsmcgd 15y agoYou're missing 'increased potential massive returns' from the right hand of your dichotomy.