6 ms·

Oddly enough, my experience was the opposite. After enjoying the Switch for 3+ years (purchased late 2018), the same price point bought me an XBOX Series S earl

Oddly enough, my experience was the opposite. After enjoying the Switch for 3+ years (purchased late 2018), the same price point bought me an XBOX Series S earlier this year (Series X were/(are?) hard to find and this was an impromptu purchase. Not entirely happy about that tradeoff). Suffice to say, been having a blast catching up with old favorites and new games. The backward compatibility enhancements (higher FPS and upres'ing) really put into perspective just how little gaming has progressed generationally, which makes these games that much more enjoyable. The Switch is an amazing device (own two - one modded and one non). While the availability of games increases daily, its performance will always remain the weak point. That^ and its horrible controllers. The XBX controller is sublime.

discordance 5y ago
Have been trying out Xcloud gaming lately and it works surprisingly well. Although I won't be able to play on a train or plane, it will definitely fill my travel/hotel gaming use case.
Jensson 5y ago
> While the availability of games increases daily, its performance will always remain the weak point. Honestly I don't care that much about performance any longer, graphics were mostly good enough 10 years ago. Modern graphics looks better when you put them side by side, but the graphics 10 years ago was good enough that you easily get used to it. The current switch has problems running 10 year old high end graphics, yeah that is a problem, but the switch is 5 year old hardware, if they made a new switch with modern hardware it should be able to run all those games smoothly.
- KennyBlanken 5y ago
  Honestly, you probably haven't seen top-notch modern game graphics. I remember being wowed a couple years ago by each successive release of Mass Effect that I worked my way through. ME:Andromeda may have been a bit of a dumpster fire, but the graphics were pretty as hell. Then I played Control, and it blew my socks off. The recent Alien game was also stunning.
  - shados 5y ago
    Or it could be the opposite. I have a high-end gaming PC. I have a Switch. They feel pretty much interchangeable to me when it comes to graphics. The difference is nights and day...and I don't care one bit. Frame rate is another story and definitely an issue with the Switch, mostly BECAUSE they try to push the graphics too far. Mario Odyssey runs at 60fps. It's not as good as what my PC and monitor can display, but it's...okay. Too many games can't keep 30fps because they just had to put more shadows and polygons for no good reason. Still, for the most part I have just as much fun with it as I do with PC games. I have both just for variety. I use an Nvidia Shield TV when I want to play the PC games on the couch. Looking forward to the Steam Deck though. Being able to play Monster Hunter Rise's PC version in a form factor similar to the Switch will be quite nice.
    - Xplune13 5y ago
      > They feel pretty much interchangeable to me when it comes to graphics. > The difference is nights and day...and I don't care one bit. You used these 2 sentences back to back. Tbh it's just you not caring about graphics whole lot, but can see the difference. To say that they're interchangeable is kinda hilarious because they're objectively better on PC, consoles than on Switch. You, yourself said so and the whole point in this thread was that of "how graphics definitely improved over the last 10 years" and not a subjective opinion of you not caring (which is fine but invalid in this conversation). Also, one can easily notice graphical differences between games that are released now and 10 years ago.
      - hiptobecubic 5y ago
        Their point was not that the difference is invisible, it's that it doesn't matter. I find for most games that the PS controllers and XBox controllers are interchangeable, but not that they are indistinguishable.
  - kyriakos 5y ago
    Control was the first game I played on series x after upgrading from a 360 which was collecting dust. Also have a quite decent pc with entry level gpu but control on series x blew my mind. In all honesty xsx graphics fidelity can't be compared to my sons Nintendo switch when you play the games on TV, I assume the same goes for ps5. Games did improve a lot and maybe all someone needs is to stay off gaming for a bit to notice the difference because the changes are less ground breaking and more gradual. If you look at Nintendo first party titles they are not even trying to compete in graphics. Nintendo is just always spot on when trying to make games for the age group they target.
- fishtacos 5y ago
  30 fps v. 60 fps is a large enough difference to affect gameplay enjoyment. The resolution and texture clarity is not nearly as important as fluidity and responsiveness in controls. There are a handful of Switch games that reach 60 fps, so it has a ton of promise, but a 2.0 release would certainly be great.
  - philliphaydon 5y ago
    > 30 fps v. 60 fps is a large enough difference to affect gameplay enjoyment. That’s very dependent on the game. Playing a racing game at 30fps is horrible. Playing Mario games 30fps. Is fine.
    - fishtacos 5y ago
      SNES platformers ran at 60 fps in almost every game, and definitely every Mario game, SM64 was the sole exception. SMO was also 60 fps. There is no category of games that would not improve in playability from 30 to 60 fps. Not trying to be argumentative here. As mentioned upthread, I own 2 Switch consoles and the difference between 30 and 60 fps when running the same or similar games are stark. Perhaps i'm more sensitive than others.
      - farmerbb 5y ago
        Super Mario Sunshine on the GameCube also ran at 30fps.
      - philliphaydon 5y ago
        It’s just slower moving games it’s less noticeable. I have 2 switches and I really can’t pick up Xbox or PS anymore. Except my dying wait for elden ring. But yeah. I think minimum 60fps but depending on the game 30 is fine especially if it’s super fun.
      - skhr0680 5y ago
        SMW had a lot of slowdown on real hardware
    - 5y ago
- jerf 5y ago
  I think increasingly the dominant factor in a game's graphics is the style, not the power of the engine. Give me Mario Odyssey-level graphics and good color and texture artists over a bland grey shooterfest with 100x the graphics power used any day. Not that everything modern falls into the latter category. Some are both 100x the graphics power and also beautiful. But I would submit, not more beautiful in proportion to the additional effort put in. We're well into diminishing returns on the graphics front at this point. Great games can run on the Nintendo Switch. Heck, great games can run on the XBox 360.
  - anthk 5y ago
    > Give me Mario Odyssey-level graphics and good color and texture artists over a bland grey shooterfest with 100x the graphics power used any day. Kinda like PC's back in the day with Max Payne 1 against Unreal 2 engine games. MP looked far more realistic due to a vastly better artwork on textures.
- Xplune13 5y ago
  > Modern graphics looks better when you put them side by side, but the graphics 10 years ago was good enough that you easily get used to it. Can you get used to it? Yes. Eg. Skyrim is still atmospheric, but graphically it is nowhere near what today's games offer. I'd say that one don't even have to look at games that are 10 years old and modern games side by side to see the difference. Someone getting used to older graphics is that person adjusting themselves to what they're presented, and not an objective observation and games today objectively look better even when they aren't compared side by side in my opinion.
  - hiptobecubic 5y ago
    Yes of course you can get used to it. Your brain is the same brain as it was in the year 2000. People still watch old TV shows in 480p and play old games all the time without complaining. It's not like we couldn't tell back then that Final Fantasy 7 didn't look like real life, we just didn't care because it was so much fun. People still play chess. Realism isn't everything.
KennyBlanken 5y ago
> really put into perspective just how little gaming has progressed generationally, Maybe on console, friend. Not on PC. > The XBX controller is sublime. As long as it's not the Xbox Elite, which fails like clockwork.
- fishtacos 5y ago
  As a mainly #pcmasterrace fiend here, I disagree. The XBX, even at its low end, is an amazingly performant little (x) box. PC gaming has not advanced anywhere to a generational gap, unfortunately. As for the controller - no one should be paying 150 USD for what amounts to a couple of plastic addons on an already overpriced controller. Compared to the Switch's controllers, they are sublime. Compared to PS4/5's, they are superior but relatively comparable.
  - eyelidlessness 5y ago
    > pcmasterrace nazi things aren't cutesy
    - fishtacos 5y ago
      Jebus...
      - eyelidlessness 5y ago
        Yeah what a buzzkill I am not playing along with people using the genocide of millions of people for fun and games.
        vhgyu75e6u 5y ago
        Except that nobody thinks of nazis when reading pcmasterace, but you need to step out of your way and call out how you feel offended by a term that has no relation. Given that you are offended by it, why don't you go back even further a call out slavery and racism in colonial times?
bdowling 5y ago
Strongly disagree on the controllers. No other controller allows me to sit in the middle of my couch and stretch my arms out to both sides and still play a game.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- jbay808 5y ago
  Definitely! The handcuffs are finally off!
- skhr0680 5y ago
  Peoples complaints about the joy cons are because of their physical build quality, not the actual design
  - boopmaster 5y ago
    Uhm, actually… I get horrible hand cramps with the switch and lite models. Bulky grip add-ons are a must for me.
    - Accacin 5y ago
      Understood, but it's just the way it is, right? I get horrible wrist pain when I use a regular keyboard so 'had' to buy an Advantage2. That doesn't mean regular keyboards are badly designed for the majority of people.
- fomine3 5y ago
  Split keyboard and mouse on PC!
Hamuko 5y ago
>The XBX controller is sublime. Except if you use it on the PC. My Xbox Series controller keeps randomly dropping connection and it reports two different battery levels to Windows 10 ("50%" and "Critical"), which are both wrong, so you'll have to replace the batteries without being prompted unless you want it to die at random during a game. This is a widely-known issue, but Microsoft has done nothing to fix it: https://github.com/NiyaShy/XB1ControllerBatteryIndicator/issues/49 https://github.com/NiyaShy/XB1ControllerBatteryIndicator/iss...
Accacin 5y ago
I've always had the opinion that Nintendo consoles were best when paired with something else. For me, I have a powerful gaming PC for all my gaming needs, and the switch is for portable/Nintendo titles. I usually game at 3440x1440 @ 120hz and I don't find it jarring playing the Switch. I love it for what it is :)
- ratorx 5y ago
  I agree with the PC + Switch combo. I generally buy Nintendo first party + (puzzle, platformer, strategy) games on the switch and leave (open world, shooter) games for my PC, basically games that I likely wouldn’t play in portable mode. Before, I had just a PC, and I found myself never playing the graphically simpler games (if I’m sitting at my PC, I might as well be playing an intensive game), but now I can play the mechanically simpler games in bed with the switch!

discordance 5y ago

Have been trying out Xcloud gaming lately and it works surprisingly well. Although I won't be able to play on a train or plane, it will definitely fill my travel/hotel gaming use case.

Jensson 5y ago

> While the availability of games increases daily, its performance will always remain the weak point. Honestly I don't care that much about performance any longer, graphics were mostly good enough 10 years ago. Modern graphics looks better when you put them side by side, but the graphics 10 years ago was good enough that you easily get used to it. The current switch has problems running 10 year old high end graphics, yeah that is a problem, but the switch is 5 year old hardware, if they made a new switch with modern hardware it should be able to run all those games smoothly.

KennyBlanken 5y ago
Honestly, you probably haven't seen top-notch modern game graphics. I remember being wowed a couple years ago by each successive release of Mass Effect that I worked my way through. ME:Andromeda may have been a bit of a dumpster fire, but the graphics were pretty as hell. Then I played Control, and it blew my socks off. The recent Alien game was also stunning.
- shados 5y ago
  Or it could be the opposite. I have a high-end gaming PC. I have a Switch. They feel pretty much interchangeable to me when it comes to graphics. The difference is nights and day...and I don't care one bit. Frame rate is another story and definitely an issue with the Switch, mostly BECAUSE they try to push the graphics too far. Mario Odyssey runs at 60fps. It's not as good as what my PC and monitor can display, but it's...okay. Too many games can't keep 30fps because they just had to put more shadows and polygons for no good reason. Still, for the most part I have just as much fun with it as I do with PC games. I have both just for variety. I use an Nvidia Shield TV when I want to play the PC games on the couch. Looking forward to the Steam Deck though. Being able to play Monster Hunter Rise's PC version in a form factor similar to the Switch will be quite nice.
  - Xplune13 5y ago
    > They feel pretty much interchangeable to me when it comes to graphics. > The difference is nights and day...and I don't care one bit. You used these 2 sentences back to back. Tbh it's just you not caring about graphics whole lot, but can see the difference. To say that they're interchangeable is kinda hilarious because they're objectively better on PC, consoles than on Switch. You, yourself said so and the whole point in this thread was that of "how graphics definitely improved over the last 10 years" and not a subjective opinion of you not caring (which is fine but invalid in this conversation). Also, one can easily notice graphical differences between games that are released now and 10 years ago.
    - hiptobecubic 5y ago
      Their point was not that the difference is invisible, it's that it doesn't matter. I find for most games that the PS controllers and XBox controllers are interchangeable, but not that they are indistinguishable.
- kyriakos 5y ago
  Control was the first game I played on series x after upgrading from a 360 which was collecting dust. Also have a quite decent pc with entry level gpu but control on series x blew my mind. In all honesty xsx graphics fidelity can't be compared to my sons Nintendo switch when you play the games on TV, I assume the same goes for ps5. Games did improve a lot and maybe all someone needs is to stay off gaming for a bit to notice the difference because the changes are less ground breaking and more gradual. If you look at Nintendo first party titles they are not even trying to compete in graphics. Nintendo is just always spot on when trying to make games for the age group they target.
fishtacos 5y ago
30 fps v. 60 fps is a large enough difference to affect gameplay enjoyment. The resolution and texture clarity is not nearly as important as fluidity and responsiveness in controls. There are a handful of Switch games that reach 60 fps, so it has a ton of promise, but a 2.0 release would certainly be great.
- philliphaydon 5y ago
  > 30 fps v. 60 fps is a large enough difference to affect gameplay enjoyment. That’s very dependent on the game. Playing a racing game at 30fps is horrible. Playing Mario games 30fps. Is fine.
  - fishtacos 5y ago
    SNES platformers ran at 60 fps in almost every game, and definitely every Mario game, SM64 was the sole exception. SMO was also 60 fps. There is no category of games that would not improve in playability from 30 to 60 fps. Not trying to be argumentative here. As mentioned upthread, I own 2 Switch consoles and the difference between 30 and 60 fps when running the same or similar games are stark. Perhaps i'm more sensitive than others.
    - farmerbb 5y ago
      Super Mario Sunshine on the GameCube also ran at 30fps.
    - philliphaydon 5y ago
      It’s just slower moving games it’s less noticeable. I have 2 switches and I really can’t pick up Xbox or PS anymore. Except my dying wait for elden ring. But yeah. I think minimum 60fps but depending on the game 30 is fine especially if it’s super fun.
    - skhr0680 5y ago
      SMW had a lot of slowdown on real hardware
  - 5y ago
jerf 5y ago
I think increasingly the dominant factor in a game's graphics is the style, not the power of the engine. Give me Mario Odyssey-level graphics and good color and texture artists over a bland grey shooterfest with 100x the graphics power used any day. Not that everything modern falls into the latter category. Some are both 100x the graphics power and also beautiful. But I would submit, not more beautiful in proportion to the additional effort put in. We're well into diminishing returns on the graphics front at this point. Great games can run on the Nintendo Switch. Heck, great games can run on the XBox 360.
- anthk 5y ago
  > Give me Mario Odyssey-level graphics and good color and texture artists over a bland grey shooterfest with 100x the graphics power used any day. Kinda like PC's back in the day with Max Payne 1 against Unreal 2 engine games. MP looked far more realistic due to a vastly better artwork on textures.
Xplune13 5y ago
> Modern graphics looks better when you put them side by side, but the graphics 10 years ago was good enough that you easily get used to it. Can you get used to it? Yes. Eg. Skyrim is still atmospheric, but graphically it is nowhere near what today's games offer. I'd say that one don't even have to look at games that are 10 years old and modern games side by side to see the difference. Someone getting used to older graphics is that person adjusting themselves to what they're presented, and not an objective observation and games today objectively look better even when they aren't compared side by side in my opinion.
- hiptobecubic 5y ago
  Yes of course you can get used to it. Your brain is the same brain as it was in the year 2000. People still watch old TV shows in 480p and play old games all the time without complaining. It's not like we couldn't tell back then that Final Fantasy 7 didn't look like real life, we just didn't care because it was so much fun. People still play chess. Realism isn't everything.

KennyBlanken 5y ago

> really put into perspective just how little gaming has progressed generationally, Maybe on console, friend. Not on PC. > The XBX controller is sublime. As long as it's not the Xbox Elite, which fails like clockwork.

fishtacos 5y ago
As a mainly #pcmasterrace fiend here, I disagree. The XBX, even at its low end, is an amazingly performant little (x) box. PC gaming has not advanced anywhere to a generational gap, unfortunately. As for the controller - no one should be paying 150 USD for what amounts to a couple of plastic addons on an already overpriced controller. Compared to the Switch's controllers, they are sublime. Compared to PS4/5's, they are superior but relatively comparable.
- eyelidlessness 5y ago
  > pcmasterrace nazi things aren't cutesy
  - fishtacos 5y ago
    Jebus...
    - eyelidlessness 5y ago
      Yeah what a buzzkill I am not playing along with people using the genocide of millions of people for fun and games.
      - vhgyu75e6u 5y ago
        Except that nobody thinks of nazis when reading pcmasterace, but you need to step out of your way and call out how you feel offended by a term that has no relation. Given that you are offended by it, why don't you go back even further a call out slavery and racism in colonial times?

bdowling 5y ago

Strongly disagree on the controllers. No other controller allows me to sit in the middle of my couch and stretch my arms out to both sides and still play a game.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
jbay808 5y ago
Definitely! The handcuffs are finally off!
skhr0680 5y ago
Peoples complaints about the joy cons are because of their physical build quality, not the actual design
- boopmaster 5y ago
  Uhm, actually… I get horrible hand cramps with the switch and lite models. Bulky grip add-ons are a must for me.
  - Accacin 5y ago
    Understood, but it's just the way it is, right? I get horrible wrist pain when I use a regular keyboard so 'had' to buy an Advantage2. That doesn't mean regular keyboards are badly designed for the majority of people.
fomine3 5y ago
Split keyboard and mouse on PC!

Hamuko 5y ago

>The XBX controller is sublime. Except if you use it on the PC. My Xbox Series controller keeps randomly dropping connection and it reports two different battery levels to Windows 10 ("50%" and "Critical"), which are both wrong, so you'll have to replace the batteries without being prompted unless you want it to die at random during a game. This is a widely-known issue, but Microsoft has done nothing to fix it: https://github.com/NiyaShy/XB1ControllerBatteryIndicator/issues/49 https://github.com/NiyaShy/XB1ControllerBatteryIndicator/iss...

Accacin 5y ago

I've always had the opinion that Nintendo consoles were best when paired with something else. For me, I have a powerful gaming PC for all my gaming needs, and the switch is for portable/Nintendo titles. I usually game at 3440x1440 @ 120hz and I don't find it jarring playing the Switch. I love it for what it is :)

ratorx 5y ago
I agree with the PC + Switch combo. I generally buy Nintendo first party + (puzzle, platformer, strategy) games on the switch and leave (open world, shooter) games for my PC, basically games that I likely wouldn’t play in portable mode. Before, I had just a PC, and I found myself never playing the graphically simpler games (if I’m sitting at my PC, I might as well be playing an intensive game), but now I can play the mechanically simpler games in bed with the switch!