3 ms·
> entertaining for both people involved That would be the case, if it were limited to the two parties (one of which can't be arsed to be physically present).
by throwaway9q93k 5y ago
> entertaining for both people involved
That would be the case, if it were limited to the two parties (one of which can't be arsed to be physically present).
However in this case, the transaction is then being recorded and turned into fuel for /personal gain/ of one of the parties. Possibly without knowledge, and almost definitely without consent of the other.