3 ms·
The charitable interpretation of bringing this up and making it part of your public internet footprint is 'in a heated discussion about strongly held political
by pvg 5y ago
The charitable interpretation of bringing this up and making it part of your public internet footprint is 'in a heated discussion about strongly held political beliefs, you inadvertently referenced a white nationalist talking point'.
The uncharitable one is 'you're a nazi'.
That's the only thing I'm trying to convey to you.
- _-david-_ 5y agoThe charitable interpretation of your post and making it part of your public internet footprint is 'in a heated discussion about strongly held political beliefs, you inadvertently said something is a conspiracy theory when it is not. The uncharitable one is 'you support white replacement'. That's the only thing I'm trying to convey to you. Hitler was a vegetarian. Hitler was a Nazi. Does that mean vegetarians are Nazis? I don't think so. Just because some Nazis point something out doesn't mean that everyone who points it out is a Nazi.