3 ms·
I think they're two sides of the same coin. _How_ do we have any experience will be more easily answered the more we know about _what_ we actually experience.
by beardedetim 5y ago
I think they're two sides of the same coin.
_How_ do we have any experience will be more easily answered the more we know about _what_ we actually experience. And _what_ we experience is predicated upon _how_ we experience it. I agree both need investigating.
The _bigger_ question I see the coin representing is _who or what_ is experiencing in the first place? The way I see it, it's not really _a thing_ experiencing _something_ but instead _things_ experiencing _things_ at _times_.
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoThat presupposes that (a) panpsychism or semi-panpsychism is false (i.e. that qualia are not inherent properties of either anything at all, nor of "any sufficiently complex system") and that (b) there is a "how" that can be answered. I agree with you about the "things experiencing things at times".