3 ms·
In addition, since I am the creator of this extension I had a similar problem in the past. Chrome Web Store had rejected one version of my extension with the ex
by thunderarea 5y ago
In addition, since I am the creator of this extension I had a similar problem in the past. Chrome Web Store had rejected one version of my extension with the explanation that the adblocker function is irrelevant to the main purpose of the extension. I send them an email explaining that the adblocking function is crucial for my extension because the ads interfere with the extension and cause problems in its function. Google apologized and accepted the extension.
- thunderarea 5y agoThis is what the program policy for the extensions say: "An extension must have a single purpose that is narrow and easy-to-understand. Do not create an extension that requires users to accept bundles of unrelated functionality. If two pieces of functionality are clearly separate, they should be put into two different extensions, and users should have the ability to install and uninstall them separately."
- thunderarea 5y agoAnd thats the answer from Google: "Hello Developer, Thank you for reaching out to us. We apologize for the inconvenience caused in this matter. Upon a subsequent review, we found that your item with ID : “abbpaepbpakcpipajigmlpnhlnbennna” to be compliant with our “Single Use” policy. Unfortunately, we cannot approve a submission that has been rejected. Hence, we request you to re-submit your extension on the developer dashboard. Thanks, Chrome Web Store Developer Support."