4 ms·
> Again, you only need one way to do things, and again, it's a rare thing to need. Not worth special syntax. This really is one of the parts I like the most ab
by dewey 5y ago
> Again, you only need one way to do things, and again, it's a rare thing to need. Not worth special syntax.
This really is one of the parts I like the most about Go. It really makes so many things simpler. Discussing code, tutorials and writing it.
Every time I'm trying to do something in JS I have to figure out why every guide has a different way of achieving the same thing and what are the implementation differences.
- nightowl_games 5y agoIt'd be nice if he had at least hinted towards what 'the way' is for this problem.
- cle 5y agoIt’s in the article he’s responding to.