>the “science” was so captured that health agencies literally changed the definition of herd immunity to pretend that natural immunity was not a contributor des

>the “science” was so captured that health agencies literally changed the definition of herd immunity to pretend that natural immunity was not a contributor despite overwhelming data not only that it was (as it always has been) but that it was far more effective than vaccines. the failure of vaccines to stop spread has been total. they almost certainly made it worse. it’s not at all clear they even help with severity. it does not look that way in the societal data and the studies are so riddled with methodological slanting to shift outcomes that their output is literal bayseian datacrime. Both the article and the author are coocoo. But that won't stop a bunch of commenters who haven't read it! Fear the ones who did read this drivel and agree with it.