3 ms·
You can still offend a friend. Either way, you sitting here deciding what she needs is probably offensive to her; and you are still suggesting the only thing in
by petee 5y ago
You can still offend a friend. Either way, you sitting here deciding what she needs is probably offensive to her; and you are still suggesting the only thing in life for her is baby, yet that is only your opinion
- theGeatZhopa 5y agoYes. I understand what you mean. My point is that some are engaging because they get a feeling being important - in my comment, I pointed out that there is no sense to believe in chips and robots in vaccines, especially if you have studied that for 8 years (16 semester. Yes. You're a German engineer!) and you know the limits of technology. So, why the heck would some one believe that??? It's like a car maker suddenly believe, it's not gasoline you get on the gas stations put in your car, but pure alkohol - why would some one start to believe a thing against all the better knowledge? So I derived from that, that the things she makes now gives her something that she don't get without.. and she likes what she gets. The only thing that can distract her and pull her back to earth is having a child and focusing on the caretaking. There is nothing wrong with that. And it's not my opinion, but a statement that nothing else will help. It points out the impact of engagement in conspiracies and (in her case) it's so big, that only having a child (the biggest distraction on earth) could change that. Nothing else will help except that. So. What she needs or not, isn't the point of discussion and actually, she's desperate to having a child.. No one wants lol