3 ms·

enable js?

• josefx 5y ago
  On an untrusted site, where the content is readily available in the source view? No thanks, malware and other cryptominers are still a thing.
  • hansel_der 5y ago
    useless use of js is a thing
  • levesque 5y ago
    I've been browsing some website with js disabled and I must say, when it doesn't completely break a website (ex. website with paywalls or relying heavily on dynamic content), it feels like a much better version of the web. No flashy pop-ups, no randomly reloading content, no video ads every 2 paragraph, no banners(!). Wouldn't say malware and js cryptominers are a big worry of mine though, unless you go on really disreputable websites.
• scim-knox-twox 5y ago
  Why? All content is already loaded, but it's covered by loader. Every site should be usable without CSS / JS. Nobody remember Progressive Enhancement nowadays? https://wikiless.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement?lang=en https://wikiless.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement?lang=en
  • jacobjuul 5y ago
    but asking the author (who didn't even submit this link), to change his website due to your preference of not using js seems a bit priviliged. Enable js, or move on.
    • scim-knox-twox 5y ago
      Don't comment, move on… > but asking the author (who didn't even submit this link) Why I should ask author, who submits this link? I'm asking author of this article, submitting has nothing to it. > to your preference It's not my preference, it's standards. Suggest read about it.
      • jacobjuul 5y ago
        author of the article