5 ms·
Your article shows that Java, Scala, and .NET are all faster than significantly faster than Go in latency and throughput, and can beat C++ as well. This only a
by manigandham 5y ago
Your article shows that Java, Scala, and .NET are all faster than significantly faster than Go in latency and throughput, and can beat C++ as well.
This only affirms our point that JIT can keep up with, or beat, AOT already.
- blub 5y agoIt can, after a warm-up period and by using 10x the memory and likely non-idiomatic code. Sometimes one can live with that, sometimes not.
- pjmlp 5y agoOnly when the users are clueless to configure JIT caches. As for non idiomatic code, that is even worse for Go code, as it lacks many of the performance tuning knobs.
- kaba0 5y agoLook at benchmark game’s java programs - it is very idiomatic compared to most other contenders yet it is exceedingly fast
- fnord123 5y agoI literally said this in my comment.