3 ms·
I'm not entirely convinced by his arguments, "oh, if you want the features of zfs you just this bunch of other stuff and it will come in more performant, stable
by dusted 5y ago
I'm not entirely convinced by his arguments, "oh, if you want the features of zfs you just this bunch of other stuff and it will come in more performant, stable and less buggy than zfs".. Even if that was the case, I don't feel convinced that I would be as capable of recovering from a disaster with that many moving parts.
"Unless you have ECC", of course I have ECC, it's for my file storage.
That said, there are valid points and something to be considered, especially the licensing stuff is a bit scary.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- posix_me_less 5y agoThe licensing scare is overblown. You only need to worry if you want to distribute software that includes both ZFS and Linux, like Canonical does (and they decided it's worth the small risk). If you just use ZFS and Linux on your machines, there is no licensing issue whatsoever.