3 ms·
I'm going to enjoy watching this prosecuted. Andrew is a persistent guy, and he really hates this shit. (understandably) FB don't have a leg to stand on here.
by senectus1 5y ago
I'm going to enjoy watching this prosecuted.
Andrew is a persistent guy, and he really hates this shit. (understandably)
FB don't have a leg to stand on here.. its trivial to see these scams are scams, they plaster his face and name all over them, make it look official by putting ABC NEWS or 7 NEWS etc (mainstream media) logo's all over it and when you click the link it'll go through to an obviously hacked web site (eg www.bobsgardeningandplants.com.au/cryptonews).
FB couldn't possibly claim its too hard or that there is no way that they could know.
- ehnto 5y ago> FB couldn't possibly claim its too hard or that there is no way that they could know. I have always wondered how this is a defense. Surely it's just admitting you can't run your operation safely at scale and so shouldn't be running it at that scale in the first place? There seems to be an expectation that scale is the most important thing, but if scale stops being managable or safe, why does that mean we just give up and let it grow? If I made a fuel bowser that went so fast that fuel went all over the place, saying "Sorry, it's too fast to manage" isn't really a valid defense. I should slow down the fuel bowser.
- Handytinge 5y agoThis has been my argument for years. If companies are not able to moderate their content then they should not be allowed to grow.