It's a familiar pattern at this point: a piece complaining about 'cancel culture' that conveniently elides actually mentioning any of the content that got peopl

It's a familiar pattern at this point: a piece complaining about 'cancel culture' that conveniently elides actually mentioning any of the content that got people 'canceled', while focusing on the impolite responses of the 'cancelers' and implicitly or explicitly arguing that literally anything should be allowed (or, rather, forced to be printed under an organization or government's auspices) as long as it's framed in a polite manner.