4 ms·
When I first opened the site, I wondered if it was a more technical/wonkish dive, or whether it was a political take. Looking at the root site prospect.org mad
by metacritic12 5y ago
When I first opened the site, I wondered if it was a more technical/wonkish dive, or whether it was a political take.
Looking at the root site prospect.org made it clear it's the latter.
Don't get me wrong, their thesis can still be right and their fact presented are still valuable, but this is like reading about "is free trade good" in the Economist. I would take away the facts, not the conclusion.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pessimizer 5y agoSo just pure ad hominem? No reference to the article, just the url?
- usefulcat 5y agoFWIW I read TFA and came to much the same conclusion. I would have appreciated a lot less subjective “X is bad” type content and a lot more objective explanation.
- glkjlkjerh 5y ago[flagged]