4 ms·
Here somebody took the time to look at 30 of these studies. It is an interesting read. https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ivermectin-much-more-than-you-want
by the_why_of_y 5y ago
Here somebody took the time to look at 30 of these studies. It is an interesting read.
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ivermectin-much-more-than-you-wanted https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ivermectin-much-more-t...
- jamesblonde 5y agoThat's a well-written hit piece by Scott Alexander. This isn't big tobacco of old who transparently lie. This article gives short biased summaries of all papers, and leaves out all the good results of many papers. Even well run studies, like Chaccour, that shown stat sign reduction in cough and ansomnia in only N=24, he spins as a negative result. And the Italian study that just barely misses stat sig reduction in viral load - well he doesn't tell you that, does he? Scott also believes the benefit from IVM is because of worm reduction. The Ijatai study with >120k subjects is an area of Brazil with no worms, proving that is transparent nonsense.