>Trying to argue its not a monopoly is engaging in the worst type of pointless semantic argument. So, you think this bill is a waste of time, then? If Apple h

>Trying to argue its not a monopoly is engaging in the worst type of pointless semantic argument. So, you think this bill is a waste of time, then? If Apple has a monopoly, no legislation is needed as we already have laws to address it. Epic's lawsuit failed specifically because they couldn't prove Apple was a monopoly. This legislation's existence is specifically predicated on that there could be issues that might be worth addressing outside of monopolies.