That’s my understanding of the statement. The reason I’m irked is that you simply may never get there by not implementing features or fixing bugs (you know, bec

That’s my understanding of the statement. The reason I’m irked is that you simply may never get there by not implementing features or fixing bugs (you know, because it got cancelled due to never being useful enough to make it). Its not binary but by setting the bar too low, you never get their either. My irk is that the premise is that anything not chosen is too “perfect.” Also annoying is having “minimum viable products” that aren’t actually viable.