> I just suspect they are "regional", so to speak, and not reflective of the larger Lisp community yeah i think there is definitely a component of that which l

> I just suspect they are "regional", so to speak, and not reflective of the larger Lisp community yeah i think there is definitely a component of that which led to my claim. i think it is better that 'lisp' should refer to a whole family of languages when context is not obvious. even when context is clear it is helpful to distinguish what lisp one is talking about in order to avoid ambiguity