4 ms·
I'm pretty sure the gov't would look at printing the receiver as precisely the same as milling one on a CNC machine. Transferring it is going to be treated the
by hvs 15y ago
I'm pretty sure the gov't would look at printing the receiver as precisely the same as milling one on a CNC machine.
Transferring it is going to be treated the same as any other firearm transfer in the U.S. as well.
- jarrett 15y agoExactly my point. I think all the speculation about the legal ramifications of printing a receiver is off-base. I see no reason why the government wouldn't view it as just another form of manufacturing.
- commandar 15y ago>Transferring it is going to be treated the same as any other firearm transfer in the U.S. as well. i.e., expect the BATFE to get rather upset with you if you manufacture a receiver intending to transfer it to someone else without being a licensed firearms manufacturer. Manufacturing a firearm for personal use is generally good to go as long as you stay within the bounds of NFA, etc regulations.