I assume they run the gamut from maximally happy, to whatever their threshold for leaving is. Which is why I used a tautological descriptor. You're taking a p

I assume they run the gamut from maximally happy, to whatever their threshold for leaving is. Which is why I used a tautological descriptor. You're taking a plausibly-most-likely scenario and using it to cast an assumption about the emotional state of hundreds of thousands of people. Don't you think you might be talking out of your ass?