I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Google's Smart Reply, along with most (I think all?) of Google autocomplete features, uses a neural network: http

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Google's Smart Reply, along with most (I think all?) of Google autocomplete features, uses a neural network: https://research.google/pubs/pub45189/ https://research.google/pubs/pub45189/ Are you saying that in general statistical modeling is not the same thing as truly "understanding" a concept? Your original comment seemed to suggest that there wasn't utility in this kind of model--which I disagree with--but if you are more generally saying that this is not the same as human intelligence, I think that authors would probably agree with you.