It takes time to work through, but ultimately I don't find it very complicated because it comes down to the single issue: Someone today has a shelter atop some

It takes time to work through, but ultimately I don't find it very complicated because it comes down to the single issue: Someone today has a shelter atop some soil and believes that someone else should not have a shelter atop some soil, and the person who currently has shelter atop some soil profits by preventing people from creating new shelter atop some soil. People generally introduce the other issues that are outside of this narrowly defined immoral position.