3 ms·

Doesn't he have a response on his website? I swear I read it at some point

• FabHK 5y ago
  Oh, right, thank you and GP for reminding me, there was more discussion of this: Here Gelman's pieces (at stat modeling): https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/11/18/is-matthew-walkers-why-we-sleep-riddled-with-scientific-and-factual-errors/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/11/18/is-matthew... https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/12/27/why-we-sleep-data-manipulation-a-smoking-gun/ https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/12/27/why-we-sle... (<- more links in this one) Quote from Gelman: > We’ve left “super-important researcher too busy to respond to picky comments” territory and left “well-intentioned but sloppy researcher can’t keep track of citations” territory and entered “research misconduct” territory. This may be a response by Walker to criticism: https://sleepdiplomat.wordpress.com/2019/12/19/why-we-sleep-responses-to-questions-from-readers/ https://sleepdiplomat.wordpress.com/2019/12/19/why-we-sleep-... Here's a reddit discussion where Guzey responds to that response and raises further points: https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/ekdbo2/matthew_walker_responds_to_guzey_why_we_sleep/ https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/ekdbo2/matt...