5 ms·

I agree. Not perfect. But there's no alternative to this kind of curated local content.

• oska 5y ago
  I don't mean to sound like a smartarse here but there would be if more ppl stopped using FB (which seems to be the trend anyway).
  • grujicd 5y ago
    Problem is we have dozens of various interests, which are different for each one of us. Single interest platforms can be good for only subset of things. FB does come with lots of strings attached. We're all aware of that. I'm just suggesting that, with some effort of unfollowing and blocking, it can be useful.
    • oska 5y ago
      But the web isn't "single interest" and, as you yourself referenced, there are open standard ways (RSS) to compile information from across it. This may have evolved more without FB so heavily dominating the scene.
      • grujicd 5y ago
        Most of this long-tail stuff we're talking about here had minimal or no web presence before FB created "alternative web publishing" experience for them. And centralized easy experience for their audience to follow what they like. I still use RSS, but sadly, that's not where I find news from local music school or running group. Could it end up differently if FB didn't show up? Quite possibly.
• rambambram 5y ago
  You just posted the alternative. ;)