5 ms·
Availability is presently limited by density of CPEs in a given geographical area. They don't want to ridiculously oversubscribe it and give people bad ping, pa
by walrus01 5y ago
Availability is presently limited by density of CPEs in a given geographical area. They don't want to ridiculously oversubscribe it and give people bad ping, packet loss and traffic speeds, because that's exactly what geostationary consumer priced vsat services as known for. If you can't get it shipped to you and are still in the pre-order queue, your area is out of capacity until more satellites are launched or the satellite+terminal firmwares are better improved.
There's a number of places that are not out of capacity and if you put in the "right" street address it'll take you to the immediate full price payment order page.
- yellow_lead 5y agoBut Starlink doesn't support changing your location yet - or does it?
- shaklee3 5y agothey are going to oversubscribe it. they're only slow to add users because they can't make terminals, not because they're trying to maintain an unrealistic QoS.
- simondotau 5y agoIs that an assumption on your part, or is there associated evidence? If there is, that’s something I’d really appreciate knowing.
- walrus01 5y agoEvery residential last mile isp in the history of commerical ISPs since 1993 has been oversubscribed, the question is at which ratio, and how that technology is implemented. the problem with terrible oversubscription on geostationary consumer grade vsat services is based on the fact that raw transponder kHz on a geostationary satellite is extremely expensive. starlink appear to be taking a very different perspective since they absolutely know about the abysmal reputation of things like viasat/hughesnet/wildblue/etc in the consumer-facing ISP space, and won't ever let it go that way. because it would be a brand name killer.
- simondotau 5y agoI agree it's a risk inherent to the ISP business model generally. I was asking if there was any evidence that was specific to Starlink "trying to maintain an unrealistic QoS".
- shaklee3 5y agoI see your other comments and you seem very sharp, but I don't understand why you think starlink will be any different, and especially why the initial launch period is anything like a mature service. for instance, do you disagree with anything here? https://twitter.com/LionnetPierre/status/1482863459834511363?t=yTDSZDtQ9Usmc6vesJSHJg&s=19 https://twitter.com/LionnetPierre/status/1482863459834511363...
- walrus01 5y agoI worked in network engineering for geostationary two way satellite for years and have been a starlink beta customer for over a year now. I also have some inside info from network engineering folks in WA state that I can't disclose here. If one fully understands the economics of geostationary it helps to better understand the tech behind starlink. I don't rule out the possibility that it goes bankrupt and ends up in a situation like the 2nd corporate incarnation of iridium, but the tech works great.
- 5y ago
- quantumduck 5y agoThis is certainly not true. You can see tons of people in different countries who literally ordered starlink a week ago getting it ahead of lots of people who preordered like a year ago because the ones who are getting quickly are likely in under utilized cells along the path of existing trajectories. It is highly likely that those who have been waiting (with someone they know nearby having starlink) is because that particular cell is over subscribed and they don't want more connections in there until they have more satellites up.
- shaklee3 5y agohttps://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-chip-shortage-satellite-internet-2021-11 https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-ch...
- lebski88 5y agoThat can't really be true. I ordered it in November and it shipped the same day. I was just in a location that had capacity.