3 ms·
It’s more than this no? I think the attacker substituted their own ECDSA verify function contract because the load call didn’t check it was the system verifier?
by randomhodler84 5y ago
It’s more than this no? I think the attacker substituted their own ECDSA verify function contract because the load call didn’t check it was the system verifier?
- kristjansson 5y agoSeems like it accepted a point to the verification function from the thing it was supposed to be verifying?
- can16358p 5y agoIsn't it in line with what the parent comment said? (Though in a simpler manner)
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]