5 ms·
Here's what you said, minus the arbitrary numbers: > Sure but think about if a particular setting is used by a minority of the user base but takes up some of t
by SrslyJosh 5y ago
Here's what you said, minus the arbitrary numbers:
> Sure but think about if a particular setting is used by a minority of the user base but takes up some of the real estate and confuses the majority of users that have no idea what it is and no intention of ever using it.
Now that we've removed the arbitrary numbers... ;-)
If the way setting is presented is confusing, then that is the problem that needs to be fixed. Remove the confusion, maybe make it less prominent in the UI, but taking away the setting doesn't actually solve the problem, it just breaks the product for the users who need it.
- zepolen 5y agoNo, the numbers do matter, your modification doesn't. > Sure but think about if a particular setting is used by a 49.9% of the user base but takes up 0.01% of the real estate and confuses 50.1% of users that have no idea what it is and no intention of ever using it. ;-)
- CRConrad 5y ago> No, the numbers do matter, your modification doesn't. No they don't and yes it does. The solution to your new contrived-numbers problem is the same as the GP's to the cleaned-up numberless one: Fix the actual problem in stead of focusing on meaningless made-up numbers.
- zepolen 5y agoThe problem is that some idiots think that 50.00001% is the same as 99.99999%, there's no fixing that.