4 ms·

What, does public opinion shield you from the burden of proof? These are outrageous claims. I pray for legislation to put this all to rest.

• ohashi 5y ago
  https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/sep/14/facebook-aware-instagram-harmful-effect-teenage-girls-leak-reveals https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/sep/14/facebook-... https://www.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/white-supremacist-groups-are-thriving-on-facebook https://www.techtransparencyproject.org/articles/white-supre... https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-facebook-russia/facebook-says-russian-influence-campaign-targeted-left-wing-voters-in-u-s-uk-idUSKBN25S5UC https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-facebook-russia... So outrageous it's easy to find evidence for all of them?
  • aierou 5y ago
    Evidence is a horribly abused term. Do you really believe any of this would admissible in a court of law?
    • ohashi 5y ago
      So it went from 'these claims are outrageous' to they wouldn't hold up in a court of law? You're a facebook shill and you're embarrassing yourself. You're not fighting misinformation, you are the disinformation campaign.
      • aierou 5y ago
        My intentions were clear in my first post - legislation will be the deciding factor. This back and forth is meaningless.