3 ms·

Maybe if they spent less time censoring/de-platforming they would have eyeballs to sell those ads to.

pavlov 5y ago
People spend more time on an app where they feel comfortable. If FB did nothing to clean up feeds, it would probably drive away both those eyeballs and the advertisers who don't necessarily want their brand to be displayed next to unfiltered user-generated content.
- Terr_ 5y ago
  One might argue FB is trying to "clean up" a problem that it caused/promoted in the first place. Over time they've changed the "feeds" to work on principles that are good for advertisers, "influencers", and viral shit in general... at the expense of regular human contact and normal trusted social circles.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
- analogdreams 5y ago
  don't follow content that makes you uncomfortable. seems like an easy fix any user can implement on their own.
  - javagram 5y ago
    Platforms wouldn’t be using algorithmic feeds (that include content a user did not opt into following) if users didn’t prefer it by their behavior.
    - colecut 5y ago
      I think users would overwhelmingly prefer chronological feeds, but that would reduce the time people spent on them...
  - mcintyre1994 5y ago
    I don't use the main FB app but when I have before it'd constantly show me stuff from pages/people/whatever that I didn't follow. I think it was mostly friends of friends, or stuff friends liked. Have they got rid of all of that now?
    - analogdreams 5y ago
      i just logged in to my account (i look about once a week) and everything i see that is not an ad is something i actively opted into or was shared by someone i chose to follow/friend.
  - rsynnott 5y ago
    Thing about Facebook is, it pushes stuff at you. Not stuff you'll like, stuff you'll _engage_ with. Last time I logged in it offered me a weird anti-trans Economist article. Life is too short to invite a robot to irritate you; that's why I don't use Facebook anymore.

People spend more time on an app where they feel comfortable. If FB did nothing to clean up feeds, it would probably drive away both those eyeballs and the advertisers who don't necessarily want their brand to be displayed next to unfiltered user-generated content.

Terr_ 5y ago
One might argue FB is trying to "clean up" a problem that it caused/promoted in the first place. Over time they've changed the "feeds" to work on principles that are good for advertisers, "influencers", and viral shit in general... at the expense of regular human contact and normal trusted social circles.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
analogdreams 5y ago
don't follow content that makes you uncomfortable. seems like an easy fix any user can implement on their own.
- javagram 5y ago
  Platforms wouldn’t be using algorithmic feeds (that include content a user did not opt into following) if users didn’t prefer it by their behavior.
  - colecut 5y ago
    I think users would overwhelmingly prefer chronological feeds, but that would reduce the time people spent on them...
- mcintyre1994 5y ago
  I don't use the main FB app but when I have before it'd constantly show me stuff from pages/people/whatever that I didn't follow. I think it was mostly friends of friends, or stuff friends liked. Have they got rid of all of that now?
  - analogdreams 5y ago
    i just logged in to my account (i look about once a week) and everything i see that is not an ad is something i actively opted into or was shared by someone i chose to follow/friend.
- rsynnott 5y ago
  Thing about Facebook is, it pushes stuff at you. Not stuff you'll like, stuff you'll _engage_ with. Last time I logged in it offered me a weird anti-trans Economist article. Life is too short to invite a robot to irritate you; that's why I don't use Facebook anymore.