> I was not aware CJDNS was unmaintained (or considered archaic). It seems (for some definition of seem lol) that more mindshare these days is around Ygg. CJDN

> I was not aware CJDNS was unmaintained (or considered archaic). It seems (for some definition of seem lol) that more mindshare these days is around Ygg. CJDNS's author is working on something else at the moment primarily, and while they're still committed to working on CJDNS, their attention is split. Ygg is getting regular changes. Ygg's codebase being in Go also makes it a bit easier to get contributions in. But keep in mind that this may just be biased based on the circles I'm spending time in. > Do you have a resource comparing CJDNS, Yggdrasil, Zeronet and maybe other similar protocol? I wish I did. This would be a great thing to put together. Maybe I should spend some time properly comparing the two.