3 ms·
You seem to be missing the point though. If this were significant, then human tesla drivers should be shown as performing much worse than other car drivers, bec
by spywaregorilla 5y ago
You seem to be missing the point though. If this were significant, then human tesla drivers should be shown as performing much worse than other car drivers, because you're claiming they have a disproportionately large riding time in "tricky roads".
A non tesla driver should be doing way better because they get to pad their score with the easy roads the autopilot supposedly gets.
- mrtksn 5y agoMaybe that’s the case, Tesla data isn’t public. They don’t publish data but conclusions and their conclusions are questionable.
- spywaregorilla 5y agoActually its more an issue that other car companies don't publish their data for comparison. On a dumb average tesla is way better, but it'd be more compelling if we could compare to new luxury brands with similar target markets
- mrtksn 5y agoHow it's other car companies fault that Tesla isn't publishing data so we can check if Autopilot miles are mostly on straight lines and human miles are at tricky situations?
- spywaregorilla 5y agoTesla publishes the human accident rate, and the autopilot accident rate. If another comparable car company published their human accident rate, and you were willing to assume that the baseline human accident rate should be the same for both brands, you could evaluate your hypothesis that Tesla is shoving the tricky situations onto humans.
- FireBeyond 5y agoAs mentioned elsewhere, just because a situation is difficult for FSD to parse and process doesn't inherently make it a dangerous situation for a human driver.