3 ms·
There are tons of YouTube channels and creators out there making videos for the expressed purpose of being sexual, and are never demonetized. Sure advertisers c
by aught 5y ago
There are tons of YouTube channels and creators out there making videos for the expressed purpose of being sexual, and are never demonetized. Sure advertisers can put forward a family friendly image out there if they want. However, using that over simplification on this platform is more than disingenuous it’s revolting. Lets play pretend that’s how the advertising algorithms tailor content.
I’ve been watching YT, Make, and others bully, harass and in some cases actually put Naomi in danger.
I am proud of Naomi, she doesn’t need me to be proud of her.
She is brave.
She dresses how she wants. Idk what you decided to put on this morning but if you’re still wearing it then it was good enough for today wasn’t it?
She works on what she wants, and she is good at it, gives props to others, among a million other talents.
She does good work for her local community and ours.
She stands up to people bullies who get butt hurt and upset because apparently they think they did something there and are surprised to find they didn’t.
Women have been expected to take criticism silently with grace. She matches energy, without stooping down to their level, as we should.
She is a credit to the tech community and we should not be making excuses to continue justifying this type of behavior just because of its dated normality; we have every reason to be proud.
It was not long ago that computer geeks were stereotyped as virgin basement dwellers, who rarely showered; “Remember the 3-2-1 rule”.
She can walk around dressing however she wants where she lives without having to worry over much about something happening to her or people harassing her. I’m not gonna lie I wish we had it like that.
She is a kind, brilliant, caring person and instead of justifying how she’s being treated we should be proud to have her.
Some of these comments, I can’t even.