This seems the obvious answer. The replication crisis isn't about published material being wrong, it's about the inability to reproduce the results of experimen

This seems the obvious answer. The replication crisis isn't about published material being wrong, it's about the inability to reproduce the results of experiments or studies in a repeatable fashion. It's not like you make a hypothesis in math and then need to go away and interview a sample of 1,000 circles and report back that, controlling for ellipses that may be misreporting as circles, the ratio of the circumference to the diameter is 3.2 +/- 0.1 (p<0.05).