3 ms·
I thought the same thing, but then I thought more, and wouldn't the abuse still happen? If she was pseudo-anonymous, but still clearly a women, wouldn't these p
by Miner49er 5y ago
I thought the same thing, but then I thought more, and wouldn't the abuse still happen? If she was pseudo-anonymous, but still clearly a women, wouldn't these people still hate on her? They would just use her username rather then her real name. They'd still try and dox her as well. It doesn't seem like it would really solve the issue.
- zozbot234 5y agoWhy would they hate on her? She would be just a rando posting about her day at the gym, as opposed to a semi-public figure that people might want to pick a fight with for unrelated reasons. She wouldn't have to stand behind everything she posts with a public real-world identity, only the stuff that's actually relevant to, e.g. her broader work.
- Miner49er 5y agoAs a writer, isn't Twitter a place where she can do her job? I think her Twitter is a part of her work. So I was more thinking she would be totally pseduoanonymous (published writing and all). I wasn't picturing a split like you suggest. I don't think that really works with her career, her Twitter is part of her writing. Plus, part of her hate is from her "broader work". The comic that the Proud Boy guy targeted.