3 ms·
Who knows. It seems like anything can be interpreted as a crime these days. Hopefully he's got good lawyers advising him.
by jxidjhdhdhdhfhf 5y ago
Who knows. It seems like anything can be interpreted as a crime these days. Hopefully he's got good lawyers advising him.
- TedDoesntTalk 5y agoAgreed. This is immensely foolish on his part. And he can rest assured that his identity is known. One crime does not justify another.
- gowld 5y agoNK committed a sovereign act of war, not a crime. NK is not under common jurisdiction as the victim.
- TedDoesntTalk 5y agoIndividual citizens don’t get to define acts of war
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- moron4hire 5y agoI don't think the North Korean government would have standing in a US court.
- landemva 5y agoThough US government claims standing in UK court to take Assange.
- at-fates-hands 5y agoWe signed an extradition treaty in 2003 with the UK: The Parties agree to extradite to each other, pursuant to the provisions of this Treaty, persons sought by the authorities in the Requesting State for trial or punishment for extraditable offenses. https://irp.fas.org/world/uk/extradite.pdf https://irp.fas.org/world/uk/extradite.pdf As I understand it, this was an extension of the original 1972 treaty.