> He's saying that CGI, despite decades of progress, seem _fake_ in a way that subtly destroys our sense of immersion True, though many older movies without CG

> He's saying that CGI, despite decades of progress, seem _fake_ in a way that subtly destroys our sense of immersion True, though many older movies without CGI also had terrible special effects the killed "suspension of disbelief". Comparing to just the best isn't really fair, unless the assumption is that all CGI is done poorly.