I've had a Subaru with Eyesight for almost six years and had zero phantom brakes during that time. I've had it disable itself momentarily (<30 seconds) due to

I've had a Subaru with Eyesight for almost six years and had zero phantom brakes during that time. I've had it disable itself momentarily (<30 seconds) due to driving against strong sunlight (it uses visible light cameras) but aside from that the system works flawlessly. I don't understand why more sophisticated systems that are continuously improved are simply expected to "commonly" phantom brake, but a much dumber/simpler system based on parallaxing two cameras (like the human eyeball, per the name) works reliably. Actually I don't understanding why nobody else is using parallax in their systems? It is basically depth information for FREE using the cameras you already have. Just angle them a little, so they overlap, and then calculate the depth.