2 ms·
The GDPR doesn't apply to data that can't be related to a natural person. Those models would therefore no longer be under the scope. Another example: You get c
by tomjen3 5y ago
The GDPR doesn't apply to data that can't be related to a natural person. Those models would therefore no longer be under the scope.
Another example: You get consent from me, count your distinct visitors for January and I revoke my consent tomorrow. You do not have to change your visitor count retroactively.
- wizzwizz4 5y ago> The GDPR doesn't apply to data that can't be related to a natural person. Those models would therefore no longer be under the scope. Give me the models and a week, and I'll dox some people with them.
- xdennis 5y agoI don't think that's a fair example, because the issue is not about inaccurate data (the view count), but illegally gathered data. An analog example would be stealing paint and painting your car with it. Should the paint be stripped off the car and given back? I don't know, but the victims are entitled to compensation, which isn't happening in the Google/Amazon case.
- tomjen3 5y agoWith your paint analogy, it feels like a "you wouldn't download car paint" situation.