3 ms·
> > Most of this content is only there to solicit an ad impression, not enough people would pay money for it. > Exactly. There’s no issue. Except all the work
by 9dev 5y ago
> > Most of this content is only there to solicit an ad impression, not enough people would pay money for it.
> Exactly. There’s no issue.
Except all the work and energy wasted on creating trash content only intended for ad impressions? The world would be better off without it.
- endisneigh 5y agoNope. Trash content is just your opinion. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist.
- Nextgrid 5y agoThe fact that nobody wants to pay their hard-earned dollars for it suggests it's more than just his opinion. In fact, let's imagine a system where one side provides ads that you can watch to accumulate a monetary balance and the other provides content (including the aforementioned trash). Do you think people will still watch and choose to pay for said trash content? Or will they choose to spend that money on better content, or even cash it out and buy a meal or drink?
- endisneigh 5y agoThat’s not the situation so it’s irrelevant.