3 ms·
I think it mostly stems from him knowing exactly what he was talking about. When you see CEOs in these hearing.. you have to wonder how close to the work (e.g.
by Graffur 5y ago
I think it mostly stems from him knowing exactly what he was talking about. When you see CEOs in these hearing.. you have to wonder how close to the work (e.g. algorithms) they actually are.
- ChicagoBoy11 5y agoUsually, I think, that's on purpose. They lose nothing by the CEO seeming in front of Congress to be a bumbling idiot... to provide more substantive material, more meaty answers, etc., is precisely what a company may not want the CEO to do in those circumstances.
- anyfactor 5y agoWhat I figured is that, the best strategy for a senate hearing is to be as forgetful as an individual as possible. You have no power over the hearing committe as they control the floor. So giving sophisticated justification will always be overshadowed by political rhetoric that they can filibuster over you. Answer questions with generic repeatable answers. Talk about organizational policies which makes everyone go to sleep. Never ask for clarification or questions. You shouldn't even really attempt reasoning with them. Do everything that makes the hearing boring tv. Dramatizing anything would result in focusing light on your activity. Don't hear the context of the questions tackle keywords with organizational policy response answers. You can never win. You might think you are the smartest person in the room but smartness won't work when you don't have the right to speak freely and people can form interpretations of whatever you are saying.